Volume 3,
Number 1 (January 2006)
From the
Web: Baudrillard and American Politics
Specular People and Democratic Impotence:
The Magic of the Yellow Emperor1
Alevtian Rea
(Olympia,
Washington, USA).
Politicians of both Left and Right
are both equally useless. But those on the Left wear themselves out
in finding a moral angle for their depression; they have not quite
the measure of their real corruption. Whereas all out free-market
liberalism provides those on the Right with an insight that is fully
equal to this depressed situation.2
The wisdom of the
ancient Greeks is difficult to ignore. Time’s patina only heightens
their maturity and prescience. A Greek historian of the first
century B.C., Diodorus Siculus, said, "As for the philosophers of
our time, for instance, most of them are to be seen uttering the
noblest sentiments, but following the basest practices”.3
What Diodorus said of the philosophers of his time may be said of
American politicians of our own time as both Republicans and
Democrats vie with each other in performing below par.
The shrinking gap between the left and the right which Baudrillard4
has long recognized can easily fool an amateur in politics. Who is
who exactly? Which side is the moral one? Can ethics to be expected
from these representatives of the people vowing to do what’s best?
Explicitly, the discourses of the liberals promise manna from the
Democratic heaven. Implicitly, their discourses claim to own the
totality of what is true, a totality that differs little from
totalitarian and autocratic claims. Meanwhile, near-absolute
unanimity in Congress is a recurring political phenomenon these
days, be it a decision to launch a war in Afghanistan and Iraq or
impinge on civil liberties on the home front. United we stand,
indeed.
In Baudrillard’s
article “A Conjuration of Imbeciles”,5
he reflected on the situation of the left in France, a situation
that looks like a lot like the situation of the liberal-left today
in the U.S. Baudrillard’s laments that: “the left …deprived of its
political energy,” the left that “now acts as a jurisdiction which
asks everyone to act responsibly while still granting itself the
right to remain irresponsible” fits well into a schema of political
life in the U.S.A. Baudrillard asks, rhetorically: “Why has every
moral, conventional, or conformist discourse – traditional rightist
discourses – moved to the left?” There was a time, Baudrillard
writes, when “the right used to embody moral values and the left, by
contrast, used to represent an antagonistic mode of historical and
political exigency.” However, the left’s current shift to the moral
stance is “nothing more than the rule of supreme hypocrisy”. At the end of his article,
Baudrillard points out that if we ever hope to revive “political
imagination” and “political will,” we have “to take into account the
radical abolition of the antiquated and artificial distinction
between right and left, which, in fact, has been largely damaged and
compromised over the past decades, and which only holds today
through some sort of complicit corruption on both sides.”
Beyond his general
statements of disappointment with the French left, Baudrillard
wheels on an example of the left’s futile effort to excoriate the
politically “immoral” Jean-Marie Le Pen, France’s notorious
politician of the extreme right. He argues that because of the
left’s moral attacks and antagonisms, Le Pen acquired “a privilege
of enunciation” and thus “an opportunity to claim republican
legality and fairness on his behalf.” In this particular case,
Baudrillard’s demonstration of the left’s political impotency only
exposes the general rule that any counter-attack, or recrimination,
governed by the same means as those used by the original “culprits”
is doomed to failure. This rule is logical and straightforward but
nonetheless is often neglected by the opinion-forming elites as they
rush “to exercise their privilege of imposing the curse of
exclusion, of exorcism, through the figure of a hated man,
institution, or organization, no matter who or what they are.” The
lessons of this blind and impotent rage are merely dismissed either
because of the impenetrable thickness of the left’s ossified and
politically outdated paradigm, or the presence of a highly-evolved
gene of imbecility which is irreversibly taking over the left’s
political gene pool.
At the conclusion of
his article, Baudrillard doesn’t offer any solutions to this
tendency to blind exorcism but rather issues a warning that “one
must always be suspicious of the ruse of contamination, a ruse
which, by means of transparency of evil, mutates positivity into
negativity, and a demand for liberty into ‘democratic despotism.’”
Reading Baudrillard’s article following the 2004 election’s flash
and trash reminds me that no matter how much Democrats trashed the
Republican candidate by ascribing to Bush all the evils they could
possibly conjure up – they never succeeded in wiping their own plate
clean of their worst nature. The Democrats, in Baudrillard’s
assessment, could be said to have failed because “they didn’t see
that good never comes from a purification of evil.” The Democrats’
low-level recriminations merely revealed the impotency and impurity
of the Party line. Therefore, paraphrasing Baudrillard’s words, it
can be said that during the last U.S. election campaign Bush served
as “the perfect mirror” of the Democratic Party that used “him to
conjure up its own evils.” It might be said that those evils were
the ones that made the voters either shun or run in horror from the
Democrats’ image, glimpsed in the political mirror they themselves
were brandishing
The renowned
Argentinean writer, Jorge Luis Borges, was fascinated by the nature
of time, mirrors, labyrinths, and identities. One of his short
stories, “Fauna of Mirrors,” recounts an ancient myth. Once upon a
time, there were the world of people and the world of mirrors that
were different from each other in color, shape, and nature. The
border between these worlds was open until the specular people
invaded the human world. However, “the magic arts of the Yellow
Emperor prevailed. He repulsed the invaders, imprisoned them in
their mirrors, and forced on them the task of repeating, as though
in a kind of dream, all the actions of men. He stripped them of
their power and of their forms and reduced them to mere slavish
reflections.”
When I look at the
present political arena, I have an association that Democrats, as
those mythical specular people, are captured by the “Yellow Emperor”
of Republicans and doomed to mirror the latter’s hypocritical
promises – or assurances to do what is good for people – and actions
that, in reality, are good only for themselves. In me, this pathetic
image evokes more disgust than pity. After all, it is they who led
themselves to be “incarcerated” while trying to incarcerate and it’s
they who “demand liberty” but instead display a Democratic
impotence.
Alevtina
Rea lives in Olympia,
Washington.
Endnotes
2
Jean Baudrillard. Fragments: Cool Memories III. New
York: Verso, 1997:6.
3
See also:
P. J. Stylianou.
A Historical
Commentary on Diodorus Siculus.
Oxford University Press, 1999.
4
Jean Baudrillard. Symbolic Exchange and Death (c
1976). London: SAGE, 1993:9.