ISSN: 1705-6411
Volume 1, Number 2 (July 2004)
Esotechnical Hyperstasis: An Excursus on the Technique of Total
Iteration
Joshua Nichols
(Department of Philosophy,
University
of
Toronto)
I.
Introduction
…in cloning, all obstacles to the
extension of the reign of the Same are removed; nothing inhibits the
proliferation of a single matrix.1
The double is the
body’s first prosthesis.2
It is through the double that the individual establishes a specular
link with the body and forms an imagos.3
This imagos enables the subject to situate itself within the
dimensions of space and time while interacting with the ever present
other. It is this imagos, this sign of the self, that allows the
subject to welcome the stranger in as an equal – a double or
external manifestation of the self – that continually transcends the
self image that is superimposed on it, thus the double acts as a
bridge, a mediator, a place holder between the subject and the other
that allows the door of hospitality to open.4
The double, the imaginary prosthesis, is the point of mediation
between the subject and the terror of death. Modern microbiological
technology has enabled the subject to penetrate through the supple
veil of the spectacle into the abstract genetic coding that exists
within each individual cell of the body. The technical reduction of
the body to an abstract code has enabled the subject to transcend
the specular double by transforming each individual cell into both a
prosthesis and a supplement – this fusion is complete in the
esotechnical prosthesis body of the clone. The ability to clone an
individual is a supplement to sexual reproduction in that it is both
an addition and replacement to sexual reproduction. Likewise, it is
a supplement to death in that a single genetic code defines the
identity of the individual (unit?) and it can be repeated
indefinitely. As esotechnical prosthesis the genetic code enables
the body to replicate itself ad infintium – the esotechnical
prosthesis negates both death and life in favor of continual
presence.5
The reduction of humanity to a series of self-replicating isomorphic
codes represents the attempted sanitization of every trace of
alterity and aberration in favor of the totality of sameness. The
power to translate this code and manipulate it through the process
of transliteration represents a prophylaxis of both identity and
meaning as all alterity is always already comprehended through the
double helix.
Cloning represents the
extension of Fordist techniques of mass production into the genetic
code and as a result “reproduction precedes production, and the
genetic model of the body precedes all possible bodies”, yet beyond
this cloning promises to obliterate all syntagmatic relationships –
it promises to vanquish all difference leaving only the associative
relations within one sanitized ontological structure – the positive
associations of meaning within one mind translatable into the binary
language of the machine, the portal to hyperreality.6
In genetic research the concepts of the prosthesis and the
supplement have been fused. This fusion not only constitutes the end
of the body but the apparent end of syntagmatic meaning through the
formation of an ever-present hyperreality – the genetic hyperreality.
Within this artificial totality both the body and language are
rendered transparent by the unity of a single ontology with both
being and shape expressible in an endless stream of binary code.7
II. The Prosthesis and the
Supplement
The first premise of all human
history, of course, is the existence of living human individuals.
The first historical act of these individuals, the act by which they
distinguish themselves from animals is not the fact that they think
but the fact that they begin to produce the means of subsistence.8
It is through the use
of external mechanical limbs that humanity is able to reproduce
itself through labor.9
The tool, the external implement of force multiplication, alters its
form in accordance with the needs and desires of the cultural
time/space that gives it a form. Within the capitalist economic
system the tool or means of production is a piece of private
property that is represented by the capitalist who purchases labor
power in order to produce commodities. “This fact simply indicates
that the object which labor produces, its product, stands opposed to
it as an alien thing, as a power independent of the producer.”10
The esotechnical prosthesis modifies the specular image of the body
through the process of production – that intimate orchestrated
tactile relationship between laborer and prosthetic. The psychic
barrier between the specular image of the self and the prosthesis
is maintained in the symbiotic interaction of production.11
The supplement is also
intertwined with the historical identity of the subject, but unlike
the prosthesis it indicates an interiority – a silent ingestion. The
supplement exists as both an addition and replacement – it is an
indication of both presence and absence.12
In the myth of Theuth and Thamus writing is presented as a Pharmakon
(existing as both cure and poison), and is rejected because the
externalization of the interiority of thought in writing threatened
to destroy the division between the external and the internal by
destroying the necessary presence of language as speech through the
supplementary appearance of the written sign.13
The supplement is internalized by the subject and thus becomes a
part of it repeating itself within the totality of the subject. If
the supplement (writing) is externalized the metaphysics of presence
is disrupted and the chaotic world of appearance swallows all true
meaning. Through logocentrism the division between the presence of
speech and the defiant absence of writing is maintained and thus the
unity of the ontological structure is maintained by the presence of
the absent voice of The Logos.14
Both the prosthesis and
the supplement exist in symbiosis with the body – the former
relating to and augmenting the body’s externality and the latter
both adding to and replacing the body through internalization. The
tension between the specular image of the body and the prosthesis
and supplement, the tension that maintains the tactile image of the
body as a whole – a presence, is disintegrated by the introduction
of the esotechnical prosthesis (DNA). The techniques of genetic
research reduce the body to its most basic unit (essence?) and its
presence is henceforth defined by a double helix. The discovery of
DNA and the subsequent development of eugenics and cloning have
fused the concepts of the prosthesis and the supplement as the
double is physically manifested from a process that translates and
transcribes the genetic code.15
The clone exists as both an addition and a replacement to the
presence of the subject through space and time. The cell and the DNA
it contains is the esotechical prosthesis that allows for the
eternal repetition of the same and “it means that the individual is
now nothing but a cancerous metastasis of his basic formula”.16
The essence of the presence of the body has been revealed as a
written language that can be translated and transcribed to
infinitely continue presence through time and space thereby
assailing the tyranny of the other that shames the liberty of the
subject and places it in terror.17
The logos now has a being and a shape in the double helix and the
subjects presence now speaks with “the sound of many waters”.18
III. The
Fordist Method of Production and the Possibility of Endless
Repetition
….there is a point of no return in
simulation: the point when prostheses are introduced at a deeper
level, when they are so completely intertwined they infiltrate
the anonymous and macromolecular core of the body, when they impose
themselves upon the body itself as the body’s original model,
burning out all subsequent symbolic circuits in such a way that
every possible body is now nothing but an invariant reproduction of
the prosthesis: and this point means the end of the body, the end of
its history, the end of its vicissitudes.19
In biology, positive
feedback refers to a physiological control mechanism in which a
change in some variable triggers a mechanism that continually
amplifies the change. This form of chain reaction is the inverse of
the controlled homeostatic reactions that occur in self regulating
negative feedback systems in that a positive loop ends only with
birth or death – its course is not interrupted by an external force.
In this manner metastasis is a form of positive feedback system in
which a cell departing from the equilibrium is rejected in favor of
uncontrolled exponential replication resulting in transient systemic
catabolism (in metastasis cancerous colonies of cells are
transported through out the body). Hyperstasis is a combination of
both positive feedback and metastasis. It is a state in which
homeostatic reactions are exponentially accelerated and this
reaction spreads metastaticly distributing the reaction through out
the host. The capitalist system of production operates in a similar
manner in that commodities are produced in order to extract surplus
value through the endless circulation of money. Labor, the “eternal
natural necessity which mediates the metabolism between man and
nature”, is transformed into an alienated commodity to be bought and
sold.20
The ravenous process of mass production and circulation for the sake
of circulation is predicated on the concept of continual expansion
within an infinite area, yet in actuality it exists within a finite
environment. This is the basic contradiction that (for Marx)
heralded the collapse of the capitalist system, yet the time
necessary to bring a collapse in a hyperstatic system is relative to
the speed of the reaction and the size of the body in which it takes
place.
During hyperstatic
reactions in the body, death is placed into orbit within the
consciousness of the host and the others that surround it.21
Humanity exists within a hyperstatic transeconomic system in which
the threat of systemic collapse is ever-present in an orbital form,
yet the human body exists in a state of relative internal
homeostasis in which sexual reproduction must proceed with in a
negative (as in a negative feedback system – or homoeostatic
reaction) cycle of life and death, hypertrophy and atrophy, thus we
remain human despite our systemic alienation (the capitalist system
shapes our bodies as an esotechnical prosthesis but it does not at
this point completely replace the individual).
The possibility of
cloning opens the possibility of absolute alienation, an alienation
that renders the division between the commodity and the subject
transparent. With the ability to translate and transcribe genetic
material the distance between humanity and the economic system they
exist within is negated. With cloning humans have the ability to
proliferate in hyperstatic symbiosis with the mode of production (isomorphicly
self replicating at an exponential rate with the circulation of
genetic currency). If this possibility were to be realized the
orbital threat of economic catastrophe would become as meaningless
as the life of one cancerous cell for as one strand of DNA is
repeated its value decreases in accordance with the hyperstatic laws
of catabolic consumption.22
The few remaining reserves of terror (radical alterity) would be
conquered by the translation and editing of the code of life. With
the clone – the hyperstatic human: “There is nothing left of them in
each case but the same phantom – like objectivity; they are merely
congealed quantities of homogenous human labor”.23
IV. The Clone and the Commodity
Money is the absolutely alienable
commodity, because it is all other commodities divested of their
shape, the product of their universal alienation.24
Money is a
transcendental signifier in that its presence is indicative of an
absence – it exists as a placeholder eternally circulating,
accumulating and materializing in the guise of the commodity.25
The signifier “currency” implies a flow – a ceaseless movement
through time and space – an immediate presence, a formlessness, a
fluidity, a transparency of pure kinetic power. Money is the
formless essence (the essence of a commodity is its value on the
market) of the commodity it is the temporary absence of the
commodity within the exchange or its differed formlessness in
orbital circulation. With the translation of the human genome DNA
has become the currency of life. Its presence outside of the body
indicates the absence of the commodity – the technique of
manipulation have made DNA fluid (infinitely malleable) – it flows
formlessly through the laboratory, infinitely exchangeable, a source
of pure creative power. Like money, DNA is being jettisoned into
orbit through its hyperstatic circulation, the homeostatic
equilibrium of C-M-C is displaced by the hyperstatic proliferation
of M-C-M. With the advent of cloning the birth and death cycle of
C-M-C (C being equal to the living form that DNA assumes) is
disrupted by the formation of genetic capital, an orbital reserve of
formless potential energy cryogenically suspended in artificial
absence.26
DNA is no longer indicative of presence, it is a transcendental
signifier, a formless presence – a placeholder – that is given shape
by the contract of exchange.
The transformation of
currency into the presence of the commodity is mediated by the
contract of exchange in which the representatives of property
consent through the demonstrable manifestation of their mutual
presence on the contract in the form of the signature. Just as
capital reduced all forms of human interaction into contracts of
exchange, genetic capital reduces all life to a genetic value, an
exchangeable commodity, a temporary manifestation of genetic
currency – representatives of a transient form of replicated
synthetic presence – representatives of absence. Presence becomes
but one side of a continual rotation of presence and absence in the
endless existence of a code. The inevitable absence of presence in
death – that terrifying absence that gave meaning to life syntagmaticly through the trace has been hyperstaticly superceded by
the endless proliferation and circulation of the transcendental
signifier – the terror of alterity is comprehended in the
translation of genetic material and overcome by its
transliteration. There is nothing but hyperreality, the traceless
presence that veils the current of orbital absence.
V. The Culturing of Alterity
Otherness, like everything else,
has fallen under the law of the market, the law of supply and
demand.27
Alterity is a
diminishing resource, the otherness that once placed the subject in
a state of terrifying awe, is now dwindling as the hyperstatic
processes of the economy expand the sphere of cosmopolitanism
(consumable/simulated alterity).28
The ability to utilize genetic material as a currency enables the
collateral rational comprehension of the other (by reducing the
other to genetic material in order to arrive on the ecumenical plane
of absolute equality) and the ability to create an always already
comprehended alterity. Within the currency of DNA the infinite
possibility of creation opens before humanity swallowing all sense
of time and space – hyperreality reigns. The world of total genetic
currency is a totality of transparency. It is the world of the
transcendental signifier – of total superficiality – alterity exists
here only as a domesticated form of cosmopolitan consumerism, a
totalized fetishism. Caught within the current of genetic material
the human exists as both producer and commodity in an endless flow
of presence through time and space. The infinite iteration of
presence through the translation and transliteration of genetic
essence vanquishes the alterity of the other and necessitates the
endless repetition of the signifier of alterity, yet like the
signifier of presence it is merely a superficial signification of
absence, the absence of true alterity – of terror and the absence of
identity signified by the clone.
Hyperreality is
described as a conceptual point at which reality becomes
indistinguishable from simulation. The simulation is a ruse, the
implied presence of something that is non-existent and as such the
simulation threatens the distinction between reality and
imagination.29
The creation of a transcendental signifier, a currency of essence,
renders the barrier between reality and hyperreality transparent as
all agglomerations of manipulated genetic material are simulations
of human perceptions – there is no originality – no alterity – no
end, only the endless movement, the eternal current. Without terror,
without death, both the presence of the subject and the terror of
alterity are meaningless facile illusions, transcribed signifiers
cut off from the initial signified. Signs, as an inseparable union
of a signifier and the signified do not exist within the circuit of
genetic currency there is only the transcendental signifier, the
place-holder that relates meaning within the associative network of
ecumenical consciousness.
VI. The Current of the Circuit
Within the Hyperreal
This ceaseless movement
of genetic currency, the boundless inertia of self-replicating
presence is by analogy comparable to the computer (the proto-portal
to the sphere of the hyperreal?). The translucent currency of
creation flows through the networks of hyperstatic operational
processes, creating and replicating within a social matrix of
ecstatic communication, an endless flow of simulation. Within the
computer electricity – the formless currency of energy – flows
through the set pathways of circuitry in an endless process of
servile simulation – replicating the sensory “reality” at the will
of the user. Within the computer associative binary symbols systems
are established and accessed on the basis of positive associations –
there is no alterity – no terror within the closed system of the
totality. The flow of genetic currency attempts to overwhelm alterity through a process of translation and transliteration – it
seeks an endless process of pure positive associative communication,
replicating alterity in the form of the cosmopolitan fetish. This
reality of genetic currency is a simulation a hyperreality in which
intelligence has both a being and a shape, where the separation
between the imaginary and the actual is shattered by sheer creative
inertia, yet a sub-orbital threat hovers behind the simulation – the
threat of chaos, of mutation.30
The insular prophylaxis of the hyperreal, the operation, the system,
the currency of presence , the sphere of the transcendental
signifier, is haunted by the absence indicated by its presence. As
the commodity is physically separated form the social relations that
produced it and thus mysteriously reflects a perceived apparent
reality, a reality that requires the transparent bonds of fetishism
that give shape to the hyperreality of perception (the bonds of
metaphysics).31
“In the same way, the impression made by a thing on the optic nerve
is perceived not as a subjective excitation of that nerve but as the
objective form of a thing outside of the eye.”32
Prophylaxis is at work in the hyperstatic replication of the same –
in the current of essence – in the search for an intelligence with
both a being and a shape. It is the prophylaxis of the system – the
operation – it is a myopic prophylaxis that merely disguises
alterity as the absence behind presence and as with the relentless
atavism of bacteria in the face of the logic of the epidemiological
triad of pathology, etiology and nosology. True alterity will arise
anew in rebellion of the hyperreal totality. The synthetic
occultation of the trace is merely a temporary perceptual eclipse –
a temporary observational aberration – despite all efforts the
trace/terror remains.
VII. Hyperstasis and the Totality
Hyperstasis reflects
both the exponential synergistic acceleration of a positive feedback
system and the transient proliferation of cancer through metastatic
processes. In hyperstatic systems energy flows within a network with
an exponential current that transforms the networks structure by
disrupting the homoeostatic equilibrium that gave it form and thus
the hyperstatic system exists under the orbital sign of destruction
as it proliferates and expands. Hyperstasis is the uncontrolled
acceleration of energy, of currency. Its manifestations whether they
be the commodity, the clone or the cancerous cell exist as
mysterious apparitions seemingly divorced form the process that led
to their formation – the presence of the commodity/clone/cancerous
cell is viewed as transient in relation to the hyperstatic system
that gave them shape. They are products of a hyperstatic process and
thus they exist as transcendental signifiers, pure presence divorced
from all meaning, a placeholder in an infinite binary associative
chain of presence and absence. By entering into the atomic microcosm
of DNA, and through the process of translation and transliteration,
humanity is becoming a commodity within the hyperstatic system of
genetic currency. The seductive power of the possibility of cloning
is the seduction of both omnipresence and the power of creation. It
is the seduction of becoming the Archimedean point, the
transcendentally signified – the logos, God.
Franz Rosenzweig claims
that: “all cognition of the all originates in death, in the fear of
death” and from this perspective the philosophical flight toward the
totality, the end of history, the formation of an intelligence with
both being and shape is a flight from the finitude of the self and
the terror of the other.33
The potential ability to translate and transliterate DNA to
manipulate the language of life is the continuation of this flight,
yet its destination lies within the sphere of the hyperreal. When
one enters the sphere of the hyperreal, simulation becomes
indistinguishable from actuality and thus by controlling the
simulation difference, the trace and exteriority that gives meaning
to language syntagmaticly is overwhelmed by a pure associative
language of presence – the transcendental signifier, the language of
one ontology, of one mind. The price of this perceived victory over
the terror of alterity is its inevitable return in the catastrophic
collapse of the hyperstatic system, the result of exponential
catabolic reactions. The victory over alterity through the
hyperstatic currency of genetic material is, as the victory of the hyperreal, a Cadmean victory, in which the power of alterity/terror
is merely prophylacticly suspended and in the burial of the other
exists its inevitable resurrection.
Joshua
Nichols is a doctoral
student the Department of Philosophy at the
University of
Toronto.
His interests include the sociology of technology, semiotics,
phenomenology, and disciplinary and post-disciplinary methods of
governance. His most recent publication is: “Data Doubles:
Surveillance of Subjects Without Substance” in
www.ctheory.net/text_file.asp?pick=410
Endnotes
1
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency
of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena. Translated by James
Benedict.
New York: Verso, 1993: 120
3
Jacques Lacan. Ecrits: A Selection. Translated by Alain
Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton, 1982:4.
4
Emmanuel Levinas. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on
Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh:
Duquesne University
Press, 2001:42-43.
5
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme
Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. New York: Verso,
1993:119.
7
Ferdinand de Saussure. A Course in General Linguistics.
Translated by Wade Baskins. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965:654.
8
Karl Marx. The German Ideology. Translated by Lloyd D.
Easton and Kurt H. Guddat. In Selected Writings. Edited by
Lawrence H. Simon. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1994:107.
11
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme
Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. New York: Verso,
1993:118-119.
12
Jacques Derrida. Dissemination. Translated by Barbara
Johnson.
Chicago:
University
of Chicago Press, 1981:82-83.
15
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme
Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. New York: Verso,
1993:113.
17
Emmanuel Levinas. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on
Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh:
Duquesne University Press, 2001:83-84.
18
The Bible (King James Version).
Grand Rapids:
Kregel, 1990: Revelations. 1-15.
19
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme
Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. New York: Verso,
1993:119.
20
Karl Marx. Capital, Volume 1.
Translated by Ben Fowkes. Selected Writings. Edited by
Lawrence H. Simon. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1994:227.
21
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme
Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. New York: Verso,
1993:26-27.
23
Karl Marx. Capital, Volume 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes.
Selected Writings. Edited by
Lawrence
H. Simon.
Indianapolis: Hacket, 1994:223.
27
Jean Baudrillard. The Transparency
of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena. Translated by James
Benedict.
New York: Verso, 1993:124.
29
William Bogard. The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol
in Telematic Societies. New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1996:4.
30
G.W.F. Hegel. Philosophy of Nature. Edited and
translated by Michael John Petry. New York: Humanities Press,
1970:199.
31
Karl Marx. Capital, Volume 1.
Translated by Ben Fowkes. Selected Writings. Edited by
Lawrence H. Simon. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1994:233.
33
Franz Rosenzweig. The Star of Redemption. Translated by
William W. Hallo. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press,
1985:3.
|